Monday, January 27, 2014

‘Information literacy is more than a set of skills



            Practically speaking, I’d like to think that all teachers are teachers of information literacy. In a way, the term is an extension of literacy, suited to all areas of learning, not just in the educational sector. The term itself is so difficult to define, but I’d like to think that as it is evolving, it is not limited by a certain set of skills, but it is a concept that is supported by skills.  These skills are seen in a variety of information literacy models such as Kulthau’s Information Search Process (ISP) model, Herring’s (2004) PLUS (Purpose, Location, Use and Self-evaluation) model and the Big 6 model (Eisenberg and Berkowitz 1990). Where would using an information literacy model fit in to my role as a teacher librarian? I am about to begin employment in a secondary school, as a teacher librarian and English teacher. I understand that I will be collaborating with junior English classes to teach a class called ‘Reading and Research’, in which I take each class through how to use the library. This would be a perfect opportunity to model and instruct students to become ‘information literate’, addressing critical thinking, processing and filtering information and assessment of their learning. Establishing what resources and frameworks will work best will be something that I have to overcome moving into the future.
            The philosophy of the school I will be working in is one that does not believe in the use of technology for technology’s sake. There is an understanding that our students have the capacity to find information, it is my role to show these students to be discerning. The principal of the school wants us to teach students to be better communicators and responsible synthesisers of information. They must, therefore, learn to filter for the best and most relevant, reliable information. The challenge is for teacher librarians to teach students to be critical and to question the content that they are presented with, whether it be newspaper articles or blog pages. Students should be encouraged to have respect for the learning process in this world of instant gratification. To be a proficient lifelong learner, students should have the ability to evaluate their own understanding, and information literacy models do give a framework for rigorous teaching and learning processes. Information literacy can be interpreted as a ‘means to an end’ (Langford, 1986, pg. 39), that end being what student outcomes will be supported and enriched by the concept.  I will have to discover what educational outcomes need to be met with the cohort of students in my new school setting.
            Alongside my teacher colleagues, an information literacy model would be of great assistance in collaborative teaching  units of work. I can see the merit of the Big 6 model, that has six steps that support stages of gathering and using information, as a teacher librarian, I would be able to instruct and model #2 - Information seeking strategies, as well as facilitate #3 – Location and Access. (Eisenberg, 1990).  To follow the structure of the model and fulfill all of the steps, the subject teacher would have to be on board to ameliorate the success of the model. On the other hand, Herring’s PLUS model comes across as a simpler framework that could be as easy as providing all teachers and students with a PLUS booklet to accompany an assignment. To use this in the library when undertaking research for all subject areas would support consistency across the school so that ‘students and school staff will view information literacy in a similar way.’ (Herring, 2011a)
Literacy in all shapes and sizes is not going anywhere but forward, in its various permutations. Giving students the skills to function well in society, with particular focus on learning, the information literacy frameworks can provide a thoughtful, reflective and critical path to accessing and utilizing information.

References
Eisenberg, M. B. (2008). Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. DESIDOC Journal Of                        Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39-47.
Herring, J. (2011). Assumptions, Information Literacy and Transfer in High Schools. Teacher Librarian, 38(3), 32-36.
Kuhlthau, C.C. (2004). Learning as a process, in Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services, Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, pp.13-27

Monday, January 20, 2014

The convergence of literacies in the 21st Century

Blog Post #2

Over the course of study, my understanding of the capacity of the Teacher Librarian (TL) has widened alarmingly. I have become engrossed, inspired and at times completely overwhelmed at the possibilities that lie ahead of me in my future as a TL. One of the areas that I perceive as most challenging is that of the emergence of new literacies, or 'transliteracy' (Ipri, 2010). A TL should have a firm grasp on the use of technology and curating a digital and interactive collection.  It is my understanding that a Teacher Librarian has to be the innovator in a learning environment if they wish to remain relevant, and that they must challenge the perception of the library so a school community can move forward into the future. The modern library environment is one where traditional reference texts and print are no longer the resources that we come to rely on to gain information.

Literacy is evolving quickly, and it is imperative that a TL works with students and teachers to act as 'catalysts for change in a new, information-rich culture' (Lorenzo, 2007) The implications of this evolution of sorts is that the TL must be the kind of student that they wish to teach. In my reading and preparation for my assignments, I am comparing aspic
ts of inquiry-based learning, and find myself mirroring behaviour that I would like to see in my classroom and library environment. I would hope that I model 'innovative thinking and inquiry' (Lamb, 2011) to the adolescents that I teach. A student with sound 'Information Literacy' not only has a good grasp of the content, but they have skills to problem-solve, to relate to peers, to evaluate and assess, to think critically and to navigate through a complex digital environment to gain the information that they seek. 

21st Century developments have meant that the digital environment is far more prominent as a medium for research and publishing. Teacher Librarians are advocates for good 'digital citizens', those students who have 'a day-to-day skill set, social responsibility, beyond basic skills, and encoding and decoding skills'. (Waters, 2012)  The learners of today are far more connected to the digital environment, with the prevalence of tablets, one-to-one laptop programs and the ever-burgeoning smart phone, 'digital natives' are overwhelmed with complex information at a rapid rates. A TL needs to use this to develop their collection and teaching practice accordingly. They need to recognise that the learning landscape is one that is interactive, multilayered and no longer confined to the physical space of the library-it moves in and out of the digital environment at any given time. Student outcomes are at the forefront of every schools' priority, and "school libraries that adapt to the digital needs of their students not only continue to build a reading culture in the school, but provide the materials for motivation, differentiation, collaboration and connections necessary for 21st Century learning." (O'Connell, 2012) 

The convergence of literacies in the learning environment means greater communication is enabled. Staff can collaborate with the TL and each other more readily with a flexible team approach. Students can be connected to their classes using microblogging tools such as Edmodo to collaborate with peers and maintain their research and information collection using Endnote. Teacher Librarians curate the online presence of the library, giving them the perfect opportunity to model proficiency in these emerging literacies. Managing the collection is no longer as simple as cataloguing printed text. A 'proactive librarian integrate and interacts' (Lorenzo, 2007)


References

Ipri, T. (2010) Introducing Transliteracy. College & Research Libraries              
                News 71(10), 532-567


Lamb, A. (2011). Bursting with Potential: Mixing a Media Specialist's Palette. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice To Improve Learning, 55(4), 27-36.

Lorenzo, G. (2007) Catalysts for Change: Information Fluency, Web 2.0,    
            Library 2.0 and the New Education Culture. Clarence Center, NY: 
            Lorenzo Associates Inc., March

O'Connell, J. (2012) Change has arrived at an iSchool library near you, in P. 
           Goodwin & J. Parker (Ed.) Information literacy beyond Library 2.0. 
          London:Facet Publishing, UK

Waters, J.K. (2012). Turning students into good digital citizens. THE Journal, 9 April. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2012/04/09/Rethinking-digital-citizenship.aspx